Categories
Overdose

BCCI, you disappointed me

Let the BCCI milk Sachin Tendulkar’s retirement, but fans will not easily forgive the empty seats during his last match.
by Jatin Sharma

The world cried when Sachin Tendulkar gave his farewell speech at the Wankhede. The speech was not made of words; it comprised emotions that were residing in his heart for long. Bharat Ratna Sachin Tendulkar became a bigger legend with his parting words. The atmosphere was electrifying and all the fans shed a tear written in Sachin’s name. For the first time, everyone wanted this test match to never end. It looked like the fans really wanted Sachin to do everything on the ground, from bowling to fielding to batting. They wished that Sachin would never retire.

But despite the tears and smiles and euphoria at having witnessed cricket’s legend one last time, I have a complaint with the BCCI.

Sachin's last matchSachin, the God of Cricket, gave us pure joy for 24 years, and received accolades not just in his country but from all over the world. There is hardly any need to go into his greatness – indeed, in the last few days there have been many articles written about different experts who know more than I do about the man and his legendary moments in the game.

Naturally, that every person who has experienced the joy associated with Sachin Tendulkar would flock to Wankhede Stadium to see him in action one last time. But once the ticketing process started last Monday, all hell promptly broke loose. The official online ticketing partner Kyazoonga’s site crashed. Meanwhile, there were rumours that the ‘general public quote’ number of tickets – 5,000 only – were, in reality, only 3,500 in number. Most of the tickets were given away in quotas and to individuals associated with the game and MCA. With such a carnival atmosphere pervading the city as the day of Sachin’s retirement drew close, it was logical to assume that Wankhede would run to a packed house during the match.

WRONG.

I was at Wankhede and I saw empty seats. With so many genuine cricket lovers clamouring for tickets, every single empty seat made me realise that Sachin deserved far better. It’s Sachin fervourobvious, what happened here – the BCCI goofed up again. Failing to understand the people’s sentiments, the BCCI only tried to please its associates and make money off people’s fervour for Sachin. If the ticket distribution had been opened to the aam junta, we would have seen a very different scenario at Wankhede. But so many tickets were sent to corporates who only believe in balance sheets, not emotions. If the ticket windows had been opened at the stadium, if the ticket distribution process had been fair, there would have been no black marketing of tickets and no need for people to pay astronomical sums of money for tickets.

Those empty seats were meant for fans, who had no option but to get tickets in black. No wonder they booed the Board authorities during the match presentation. The only people who were cheered on by the public were city Police Commissioner Satyapal Singh and the cricketers themselves.

As a fan, I was quite angry when I saw those empty seats, that were like a sign of BCCI’s greed and how they just wanted to make even this, Sachin’s swansong, a money making event.

There could have been many more Sachin lovers in the stands than at home in front of their TV sets. Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar, who has time and again credited his fans for his stupendous career, might one day be felicitated by the same BCCI on the same grounds for being the youngest recipient of the Bharat Ratna. But more than anything else, those empty seats will continue to rankle in my memory and dishearten me for years to come.

Jatin Sharma is a media professional who doesn’t want to grow up, because if he grows up, he will be like everybody else. ‘Overdose’ is his weekly take on Mumbai’s quirks and quibbles.

(Pictures courtesy blogs.ft.com, sports.in.msn.com, www.indianexpress.com)

Categories
Big story

BCCI has been unfair against ZEE

BCCI to pay ZEE Rs 140 crore in damages; launch of ICL had led to strong-arm tactics from the BCCI.

A dispute dating back to year 2006 between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Zee Entertainment Enterprises (ZEE) Limited has now resulted in a tribunal declaring that the BCCI will pay ZEE Rs 140 crore against damages on account of ‘loss of goodwill and profit’ and also in lieu of refund of security deposit with interest.

In 2006, ZEE had won the exclusive media rights to telecast all ODIs to be held between India and any other country in any neutral territory outside India for a period of five years. However, ZEE announced the launch of the Indian Cricket League (ICL) the next year, and all hell broke loose – the five-year Agreement between the two parties was terminated by the BCCI in May 2007, around the time of launch of the ICL, resulting in ZEE invoking arbitration for wrongful termination of the contract.

An Arbitral Tribunal consisting of Justice AS Anand (Retd.), Former Chief Justice of India; Justice YK Sabharwal (Retd.), Former Chief Justice of India and Justice BN Srikrishna (Retd.), Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, was set up to study the matter. Yesterday, the Tribunal ruled in favour of ZEE, holding the BCCI guilty of “exploiting its dominant position” in the game of cricket in India, and of indulging in “unfair conduct against ZEE.” The Tribunal also held that ZEE was “treated unfairly  in its commercial contracts, due to the launch of the Indian Cricket League and was illegally blacklisted.”

Accordingly, the Tribunal also passed an award of Rs 140 crore to be payable by the BCCI to ZEE by December 1, 2012. Failing the payment by this date, interest on the amount would be additionally charged at a rate of 11 per cent per annum.

Punit Goenka, Managing Director and CEO, ZEE said, We welcome the award handed over to it (BCCI) by an eminent panel of jurists.  This award is towards recovery of the losses that we have incurred in the sports business in the past.  We continue to remain committed to our sports business in the long term.

What the Tribunal observed

– The termination of the Agreement by BCCI after the series held in Abu Dhabi and the triseries held in Malaysia was clearly illegal and invalid.

– The breach of Agreement dated 12.04.2006 was committed by the BCCI and not by the Claimant (ZEE).

–  BCCI took the action of termination of claimants rights under Agreement dated 12.4.2006 on account of Claimant launching of ICL and not for reasons made out in its letter of termination.

– The BCCI seems to have been exploiting its dominating position in respect of game of cricket in India.

– The BCCI blacklisting of ZEE (and its group/affiliate companies) from participating in any bidding process of BCCI was clearly illegal.

– The Award amount of approximately Rs. 140 crores payable by BCCI to ZEE includes the Security Deposit of Rs. 30 crores with interest @11% p.a. from 31st May, 2007, loss of profit, loss of goodwill, etc.

Exit mobile version